Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Although the punishment can be severe, its purpose is not solely to hunt vengeance but to discourage probable offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.
Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For instance, a ruling within a California appellate court would not typically be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case has become or will be filed.
The mentioned recovery could be used, for the most, for corroboration in the main evidence, but by itself it cannot be a basis for conviction. They further submitted that the petitioners Bhoora and Mst. Mubeena Bibi also pointed out the place of prevalence. The said memo of pointation is irrelevant and inadmissible as absolutely nothing was discovered as a result of these pointation. The place of incidence and also the place of throwing the dead body were already during the knowledge of witnesses ahead of their pointation through the petitioners. Reliance is additionally placed on case law titled as “Ijaz Ahmad and Another v. The State” (1997 SCMR 1279) wherein it's been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
The Court regarded as the case being maintainable under Article 184 (three) since the Threat and encroachment alleged were for instance to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
This case has been cited in many subsequent judgments, particularly in cases involving constitutional legislation, judicial independence, as well as rule of law.
Case law, also known as precedent, forms the foundation from the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is important get more info for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising and marketing transparency.
She did note that the boy still needed intensive therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to get to the point of being safe with other children.” The boy was getting counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved on the actions.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly established now that the provision for proforma promotion isn't alien or unfamiliar towards the civil servant service structure but it's already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if satisfied that a civil servant who was entitled being promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his very own, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province while in the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of fork out and allowances of this sort of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded to your appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )